{"id":25468,"date":"2026-01-11T13:36:35","date_gmt":"2026-01-11T18:36:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/?p=25468"},"modified":"2026-01-11T13:36:36","modified_gmt":"2026-01-11T18:36:36","slug":"goodbye-to-our-universe-as-we-know-it-a-new-calculation-predicts-when-it-will-end","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/goodbye-to-our-universe-as-we-know-it-a-new-calculation-predicts-when-it-will-end\/25468\/","title":{"rendered":"Goodbye to our universe as we know it: a new calculation predicts when it will end"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The universe is expanding faster and faster. That is the headline story most of us have heard since the late 1990s. But a peer reviewed study<\/a> argues that, if dark energy<\/a> is not a fixed \u201ccosmic constant\u201d and is instead a dynamic field that can keep dropping, the acceleration could end and the universe could eventually switch from expansion to a slow contraction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And in the most extreme version still allowed by today\u2019s observations, the turn could come \u201csurprisingly soon\u201d on cosmic timescales, possibly in under 100 million years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That does not mean anyone has discovered the universe is about to collapse. It is a \u201cthis is permitted by the data\u201d scenario, not a countdown clock. Still, it is a provocative reminder that dark<\/a> energy is one of physics\u2019 biggest unknowns, and our measurements are not yet sharp enough to lock down its behavior over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A different kind of dark energy, not a permanent push<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In the standard \u201cLambda cold dark matter<\/a>\u201d picture, dark energy is treated like a constant property of space itself. If that is right, accelerated expansion continues indefinitely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n

Read More: Astronomers are holding their breath: one of the most massive stars in the universe has entered a strange and unstable phase, and no one knows what might happen next<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The new paper focuses on another possibility called quintessence. In this family of ideas, dark energy comes from a field that evolves, meaning its strength can change. The authors explore what happens if the field rolls down a potential that keeps decreasing and can even dip below zero. In their setup, cosmic history can pass through a sequence of smooth stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, today\u2019s acceleration ends and the expansion becomes decelerated. Then, at a later point, the expansion rate reaches zero and the universe transitions into slow contraction. The key word is smooth. This is not the Hollywood version where everything rips apart overnight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is the part that grabs attention. The team asks how fast those transitions could happen while still fitting current data on the expansion history. Their conclusion is that the change could, in principle, come relatively soon, potentially less than 100 million years from now, while still being essentially undetectable today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cosmically speaking, 100 million years is a blink. On Earth, it is the stretch of time since the dinosaurs vanished.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIf it\u2019s true, why can\u2019t we see it coming?\u201d<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This is where the paper gets subtle. Most of the evidence used to measure cosmic expansion comes from signals that left their sources long ago, like distant supernovae, the cosmic microwave background<\/a>, and baryon acoustic oscillations<\/a>. We are reconstructing the universe\u2019s behavior from light that is already ancient by the time it hits our telescopes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So even if dark energy were beginning to change \u201cnow,\u201d the effects could be hard to confirm quickly. The paper argues that the warning signs would show up first as tiny shifts in how the dark energy <\/a>equation of state evolves with time, and those are exactly the kinds of measurements that remain difficult.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you are thinking, \u201cWait, doesn\u2019t this contradict what we know,\u201d you are not alone. Many cosmologists still consider a true cosmological constant a strong baseline. But the honest answer is that the data still leave room for alternatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New surveys are sharpening the test<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The timing of this debate matters because the next generation of cosmology surveys is designed to stress test dark energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument<\/a>, or DESI, has reported results that some combinations of datasets interpret as a mild preference for time evolving dark energy parameters rather than a perfectly constant Lambda, depending on what you combine and how you model it. It is not a verdict, but it is the kind of \u201cmaybe\u201d that keeps theorists busy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n

Read More: Astronomers are holding their breath: one of the most massive stars in the universe has entered a strange and unstable phase, and no one knows what might happen next<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, ESA\u2019s Euclid mission<\/a> has begun releasing major datasets aimed at mapping the cosmic web and tracking how structure grows over time, one of the best ways to probe dark energy\u2019s role.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And NASA\u2019s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope<\/a> is being built for a wide field survey<\/a> that will trace cosmic expansion across time using multiple techniques, including supernovae and large scale structure. In practical terms, that means better odds of catching tiny changes in dark energy\u2019s behavior, if they are there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For everyday life, none of this changes tomorrow morning\u2019s commute or your electric bill. But scientifically, it is huge. The universe\u2019s fate hinges on whether dark energy is a permanent feature of space or something more like a dial that can move.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study was published on \u201cProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS<\/a>).
.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The universe is expanding faster and faster. That is the headline story most of us have heard since the late … <\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":25469,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science","resize-featured-image"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25468"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25470,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25468\/revisions\/25470"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}