{"id":27305,"date":"2026-02-14T12:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-02-14T17:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/?p=27305"},"modified":"2026-02-18T06:47:25","modified_gmt":"2026-02-18T11:47:25","slug":"californias-largest-reservoir-in-half-a-century-has-been-given-the-green-light-it-will-cost-nearly-7-billion-affect-24-million-people-and-could-change-the-future-of-water-in-the-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/californias-largest-reservoir-in-half-a-century-has-been-given-the-green-light-it-will-cost-nearly-7-billion-affect-24-million-people-and-could-change-the-future-of-water-in-the-state\/27305\/","title":{"rendered":"California&#8217;s largest reservoir in half a century has been given the green light: it will cost nearly $7 billion, affect 24 million people, and could change the future of water in the state"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In late January 2026, the Trump administration approved the Sites Reservoir <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usbr.gov\/mp\/nepa\/nepa_project_details.php?Project_ID=29024&amp;\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">project<\/a>, issuing a federal record of decision that clears the way for the state&#8217;s largest new reservoir in nearly half a century. The off-stream project would store up to 1.5 million acre feet of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/6400-km-covered-solar-13-gw-energy\/13069\/?\">water<\/a> to help supply 24 million people from the Bay Area to Los Angeles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Supporters see the project as a key tool to capture storm runoff in wet years and save it for the next drought. Critics warn it is a multibillion-dollar bet that could further strain rivers, salmon runs and public budgets at a time when Californians are already watching their water bills and the changing climate with growing unease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Sites Reservoir would look like<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Sites Reservoir would sit in a rural valley in Colusa County, northwest of Sacramento. Plans envision an off-stream lake roughly 13 miles long that would flood about 13,000 acres behind a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/chinas-plan-could-change-earth-rotation\/11384\/\">system of dams<\/a> and saddle dikes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"gb-element-a00da4e5\">\n<div><div class=\"gb-looper-46613eed\">\n<div class=\"gb-loop-item gb-loop-item-a8390598 post-30322 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-science resize-featured-image\">\n<h3 class=\"gb-text gb-text-24a51617\">Read More: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/scientists-are-issuing-a-warning-about-earths-distant-future-in-about-200-to-250-million-years-a-new-supercontinent-could-emerge-bringing-with-it-brutal-climate-change-on-a-planetary-scale\/30322\/\">Scientists are issuing a warning about Earth&#8217;s distant future: in about 200 to 250 million years, a new supercontinent could emerge, bringing with it brutal climate change on a planetary scale<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Instead of blocking a river, crews would pipe high flows from the Sacramento River into the basin during big winter storms. Stored water would then be released back into the system for cities, farms and environmental uses when rivers run low.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Project planners say 1.5 million acre feet of storage would make Sites the eighth largest reservoir in California. They expect it to serve urban customers and about 200,000 hectares of Central Valley cropland.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1800\" height=\"1013\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/sites-reservoir-map-project-location-colusa-county-sacramento-river-california.jpg\" alt=\"Map showing the proposed Sites Reservoir project location in Colusa County, Northern California, west of the Sacramento River near Willows.\" class=\"wp-image-27307\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/sites-reservoir-map-project-location-colusa-county-sacramento-river-california.jpg 1800w, https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/sites-reservoir-map-project-location-colusa-county-sacramento-river-california-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/sites-reservoir-map-project-location-colusa-county-sacramento-river-california-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/sites-reservoir-map-project-location-colusa-county-sacramento-river-california-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/sites-reservoir-map-project-location-colusa-county-sacramento-river-california-150x84.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1800px) 100vw, 1800px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">A location map highlights where the proposed Sites Reservoir would be built in Colusa County, west of the Sacramento River in Northern California.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Backers see a new tool for a thirsty state<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>California has endured three major <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/state-will-cover-its-rivers\/15353\/\">droughts<\/a> since 2007, bringing brown lawns and mandatory cutbacks for millions. Officials argue that adding new storage is one of the few ways to smooth out those extreme swings between flood and drought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Andrea Travnicek, an assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of the Interior, said the record of decision reflects years of study and public review and \u201clays the foundation for construction through strong partnerships that will ultimately result in additional water supplies for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/treasure-under-california-desert\/10945\">California<\/a>\u201d. Her comment captures why water managers see Sites as a practical way to build a buffer before the next dry spell.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"gb-element-9a066a6f\">\n<div><div class=\"gb-looper-e423f2d0\">\n<div class=\"gb-loop-item gb-loop-item-de6b0ee9 post-27033 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-energy resize-featured-image\">\n<h3 class=\"gb-text gb-text-805cf676\">Read More: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/massive-blackouts-not-this-time-the-miraculous-return-of-two-hydroelectric-power-plants-built-in-the-1980s-is-now-saving-the-country-from-an-energy-catastrophe-thanks-to-a-surgical-intervention-carr\/27033\/\">Massive blackouts? Not this time: the miraculous return of two hydroelectric power plants built in the 1980s is now saving the country from an energy catastrophe thanks to a surgical intervention carried out by CELEC in record time<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Jerry Brown, executive director of the <a href=\"https:\/\/sitesproject.org\/sites-project-authority\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sites Project Authority<\/a>, called the approval a key milestone after decades of planning. He said the analysis shows Sites can reliably capture and store water in wet winters \u201cbenefiting both people and the environment\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Environmental groups call it a costly gamble<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Opponents are not convinced that a new reservoir is the right fix. Will another big dam really solve the next drought? Environmental organizations sued in 2024 to overturn the state environmental review, arguing that diverting more water from the Sacramento River would harm already stressed fish and wildlife in the Sacramento San Joaquin Delta, although a judge allowed the project to move ahead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Keiko Mertz, policy director at Friends of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.friendsoftheriver.org\/our-work\/rivers-under-threat\/sacramento-threat-sites\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">River<\/a>, described Sites as \u201ca nearly seven-billion-dollar gamble that delivers little water at enormous cost, threatens rivers and fisheries and distracts from real solutions\u201d. Her group and allies say California should lean harder on conservation, groundwater recharge and smaller local projects before building another massive dam.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Price tag, permits and labor fights still loom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Officials now put the cost between $6.2 billion and $6.8 billion as planners update designs and factor in construction inflation. Project leaders partly blame pandemic factory shutdowns and Trump-era tariffs for the jump, which they say will eventually show up in water rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"gb-element-0ed0558d\">\n<div><div class=\"gb-looper-de01d145\">\n<div class=\"gb-loop-item gb-loop-item-5d6d715f post-27030 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-science resize-featured-image\">\n<h3 class=\"gb-text gb-text-de0bbf09\">Read More: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/the-zero-calorie-sweetener-that-could-affect-the-cells-that-protect-your-brain\/27030\/\">The \u201czero-calorie\u201d sweetener that could affect the cells that protect your brain<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of the money will come from 22 partner water agencies, while the state has committed about $1.1 billion in bond funding through the <a href=\"https:\/\/cwc.ca.gov\/Water-Storage\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">California Water Commission<\/a>. Federal agencies have signaled support, including a $2.2 billion loan offer from the Environmental Protection <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/system\/files\/documents\/2022-03\/sites-reservoir-jpa.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Agency<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Even with the new record of decision the project still needs key water rights from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.waterboards.ca.gov\/waterrights\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">State Water Resources Control Board<\/a> and must navigate a fight over who will build it. Labor unions have objected to the selection of Montana-based Barnard Construction and urged state officials to favor firms with stronger union ties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The official press release was published on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.doi.gov\/pressreleases\/interior-advances-president-trumps-executive-order-14181-priorities-approves-sites\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>U.S. Department of the Interior website<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In late January 2026, the Trump administration approved the Sites Reservoir project, issuing a federal record of decision that clears &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"California&#8217;s largest reservoir in half a century has been given the green light: it will cost nearly $7 billion, affect 24 million people, and could change the future of water in the state\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/californias-largest-reservoir-in-half-a-century-has-been-given-the-green-light-it-will-cost-nearly-7-billion-affect-24-million-people-and-could-change-the-future-of-water-in-the-state\/27305\/#more-27305\" aria-label=\"Read more about California&#8217;s largest reservoir in half a century has been given the green light: it will cost nearly $7 billion, affect 24 million people, and could change the future of water in the state\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":27306,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy","resize-featured-image"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27305"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27305\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27734,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27305\/revisions\/27734"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27306"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoticias.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}