ECONews
  • Economy
  • Mobility
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • ECOticias
  • Contact
  • Economy
  • Mobility
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • ECOticias
  • Contact
ECONews

Grand Canyon at risk — Terrifying find at the bottom sparks global alarm

by Beatriz T.
August 30, 2025
in Energy
national park grand canyon

Credits: Global National Parks

Twice the height of Status of Liberty — China unveils the tallest wind turbine on Earth

Black rocks hide the ultimate energy source — Oil-rich state reveals discovery for millennia

It’s the largest man-made excavation in history — 400,000 tons per year and the end of China

The Grand Canyon has always been seen as one of the most impressive places on the planet. This is largely due to its gigantic walls, sculpted by time, which bear witness to Earth’s history. For millions of tourists, it’s simply an unforgettable landscape. For indigenous communities, like the Havasupai tribe, it’s sacred and vital territory. But now, behind its beauty, a threat looms that could transform this natural wonder into the stage for an environmental disaster of global proportions.

Grand Canyon’s hidden gamble

When we think of the Grand Canyon, we often think only of what’s right in front of us: colorful rocks, gorges, and immense rivers. But what happens below the surface is even more crucial. There, in complex geological formations, lies a resource as valuable as it is dangerous. For decades, mining operations lay dormant, with little activity. Until the energy demand revived an old interest.

This terrifying something hidden at the bottom of the canyon is uranium. This element, used in nuclear energy production, may seem like the answer to an economy seeking alternatives to fossil fuels. However, its extraction carries risks that go beyond the economy. The dilemma begins there: is the price of “clean energy” worth the risk of a silent disaster?

Pinyon Plain Mine

The recently reopened Pinyon Plain Mine is located just a few miles from the Grand Canyon. Protected by an 1872 law, it continues to operate even after the creation of a national monument that was supposed to prevent further such activities. And its potential impacts are already generating controversy.

  • Water at Risk: State agencies argue that rocks are natural barriers against contamination. But current research suggests otherwise: underground fractures and faults can allow contaminated water to quickly reach vital aquifers, including the one that feeds the Colorado River—a water supply for approximately 40 million people.
  • Contaminated Tanks: Each year, millions of liters of water containing uranium and arsenic are dumped into open-air reservoirs. Birds and animals drink from these artificial ponds, exposing them to radiation. Spraying to accelerate evaporation spreads toxic waste beyond the barriers.
  • Radioactive Dust: Wind can carry particles released during mining to nearby forests and villages. Effects range from respiratory illnesses to contamination of agricultural soils.

Even with promises of control and monitoring, environmental violations have already been recorded (hence the Grand Canyon’s spotlight). And critics say relying solely on company measures and official reports is a gamble with a resource that has no substitute: water.

Havasupai at stake: sacred waters versus nuclear ambition

For the Havasupai, the risk is a direct threat to survival. Their name means “people of the blue-green waters,” a reference to the waterfalls that are both a source of life and a spiritual center. In other words, if the water is contaminated, there is no alternative. There is no hidden source, no plan B. This explains why tribal members describe the situation as “a single roll of the dice”: one mistake is enough to lose everything.

And this isn’t the first time Indigenous communities have faced this struggle. In the neighboring Navajo Nation, more than 500 abandoned uranium mines have left a trail of disease. Between the 1970s and 1990s, cancer rates doubled, primarily affecting families of mining workers. It’s a recent past that echoes as a warning.

On the other side, mining companies argue that uranium is necessary to fuel nuclear power plants and ensure clean energy. The big question remains: is it worth sacrificing health, water, and culture in exchange for a few years of mining? And that’s not the only problem faced recently; National Monuments has found “something,” which also doesn’t bring good news.

Disclaimer: Our coverage of events affecting companies is purely informative and descriptive. Under no circumstances does it seek to promote an opinion or create a trend, nor can it be taken as investment advice or a recommendation of any kind.

ECONews

© 2025 by ECOticias

  • Economy
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Mobility
  • Technology
  • Contact
  • Legal Notice

No Result
View All Result
  • Economy
  • Mobility
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • ECOticias
  • Contact

© 2025 by ECOticias